Is Putin becoming stupid? Anyway for journalists, it’s not getting any better…
Boris Nemtsov was shot down on 27 February. Journalists-who-know-it-all without having ever understood anything (a reminder of the Bourgeois of Molière!) rushed along with word diplomacy (largely as intelligent) to castigate the strangeness of Russian democracy.
Second hypothesis …
Some noted, however, that as a good old KGB guy, Putin would not have been so stupid as to get rid of his opponent that way and there. The new solution: it is the opposition itself who found its champion bulky and who took care of him!
It seems that no one yet imagined that Putin himself can control his opposition to orchestrate everything, knowing that he will have no trouble then to find and “punish” the guilty!
Rest assured: whatever the facts that occurred on the night of 27 to 28, we will never know them. Let’s just be certain that they have no connection with what we are going to be told.
It’s not just the writers of TV series who have some unbridled imagination, special services may have some too!
No stress: the light will come from Claire Chazal!
Claire, the feminine genius of the Journal of TF1, the French TV, assured us Saturday with her usual hilarious seriousness that TF1 would ensure the report of the demonstration scheduled for Sunday in tribute to Boris. As if that could teach us anything!
The same Claire I had seen announce that the demonstrations of January 11 in Paris had gathered 3,000,000 people in an area that contains only the tenth of that…
To say that I am delighted to have information of such quality would mask my delight to hear such drivel with an aplomb worthy of my teachers when I was a kid, and they could imagine that I did not understand anything…
If I did not know that their title is a misnomer, as chitterlings who cannot see beyond appearances, even to be persuaded that there are objects behind the mirror because they see them, I would advise you to go see the magazine Complots (& Dossiers Secrets) (Conspiracies (&Secrets Folders) mentioned by brainmagazine.fr). The information there is a little more consistent with common sense of people who can think outside the box of paranoid and shortsighted paradigms of materialism and rationalism, and who believe they have logical reflections while their logic is simply reversed.
We may be walking on our heads, but mainly we are thinking upside down…
Some linguists think they have shown that the relation between cause and effect (the real basis of logic) is not a “rational relationship”, an affirmation that is worth its weight of sauerkraut, since “relationship” and “rational” are pretty much the same word! It would therefore be better noticed that setting hysterical relationship between any two things is unlikely to be a causal relationship and that this mania of rationalism offers no serious guarantee. Anyway, if the causality is not a rational relationship, what is rationalism, if not a tool to drown the people in the technology developed by Wundt and Pavlov?
The writers of « Intelligence » who are trying to scare us by suggesting that the evolution of current technologies may skid, are indeed well aware that one does not need electronics to program people in a practically irreversible way. By the way this is the only series I saw that talks about the NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) while others just pound with the CIA and the NSA.
In issue # 26 of Conspiracy, they examine in detail programs like MK Ultra, but they seem to ignore techniques that use no drugs, electric or other kinds of shocks, but instead just those we all suffered from our childhood and made us so gullible.
Everyone has heard of Pavlov and his dogs, without really knowing what he was doing though. No one knows Wundt, yet he’s the one who founded experimental psychology with much less wacky ideas than Freud and Jung. Well, mix the two works to find how to program human doggies and you will not need MK Ultra anymore and its accessories or its coercive methods.
I would blame myself not to advertise for my “Be logical! … in God’s name” which examines all this in detail, but I must find opportunities to talk about it. These opportunities are not scarce because crowd behavior is clearly more irrational than just illogical and I do not lack of substance to introduce my nonsense.
Finally, as I said in my post about the agricultural show: “global warming, increase in the frequency of earthquakes and floods, not to mention other cosmic threats may enable this civilization to disappear before it’s entirely our fault…”
In the above mentioned post, I said, “without it being our fault,” but I prefer “before.” For details of the threats, I refer you to the famous issue 26!